San Remo Picture

Great catch Tim, I thought I saw a full body app, but then I did some editing, and nothing stays but the foot. So I took the foot area and croped it out and enlarged it for those who might have trouble seeing it.

FYI: It is not pix elation, a merging of the carpet or other object to make this, its its own entity in the picture. I did curves, embossing, inverting, color edge detection, removal of colors, changed the levels and the foot never went away. If it was the carpet then it should of blended in, and if it was some object then the shape should have revealed that.

Best picture ive seen in a long time.

Thanks Wander it's kind of funny because I didn't see this picture when I first went through my pictures after the investigation. I think it almost looks like the lady is prego or something but who knows.

😮 😮 😮 😮

something is definetly afoot

hmm it is a left foot with no right foot in sight or leg or anything ..almost like the left apperaed but the right didnt wonder if it was a amputated spirit??

Awesome picture Tim! And thanks for the hard work Wanderlust!!

Awesome capture Tim!!!! 😁

To me it looks as if the person is stepping out of a room with right leg and foot still in room...At first I thought he/she "woman it look's like to me" was holding a bucket but after looking at it more it looks like a big purse or beach type of bag, can almost make out the brackets that the handle connects to "Stuff in side and some in arms" If you enlarge this pic 260 % you can make it out better, the enlargment would not upload here for me...Looking at it even more It looks as if head is facing down and her hair is parted in the middle and up in back and can kinda make out thick glasses as well...Could be wrong but that's what it looks like to me.

Great catch Tim

I thought that too at first NAP, but keep in mind there is a double exposure, which makes it hard to decern whats real, and whats a artifact, thats why I only showed the foot since its the only thing in the picture which some one cant blame on the double exposure.

(If you look in the distance at the white legs of the chair/table you can see that it got double exposed as did the wall.)

I thought that too at first NAP, but keep in mind there is a double exposure, which makes it hard to decern whats real, and whats a artifact, thats why I only showed the foot since its the only thing in the picture which some one cant blame on the double exposure.

(If you look in the distance at the white legs of the chair/table you can see that it got double exposed as did the wall.)

Yes I thought about the double exposure as well Wander, the only thing that puzzle's me is if you look at the lighting and the way it bounces off of the objects in the hall to cast shadow's on walls and floor you can kinda make out what shadow's belong to wich object, the one shadow on the floor could be from the person but looking at it futher and the foot being on the floor, I'm not seeing a shadow from leg or foot, again I could be wrong the patterns from carpet does throw things off.

How could it be a double exposure if it's a digital pic? Long exposure in low light i understand, but double on digital? I don't think so....seems real to me...

Chuck

How could it be a double exposure if it's a digital pic? Long exposure in low light i understand, but double on digital? I don't think so....seems real to me...

Chuck

Shutter speed could give that effect... 🙂

Awesome find Tim. I love it, though I'd like to hear more on the story around the picture. Other people in the area? shutter speed? that kind of stuff. Oh man if that was center of the hall it would be so much harder to dismiss things. I luv it.

Is this the same hallway you guys caught a great shadow person image in? It looks very similar if it isn't.

That bare foot is awesome! Looks like a heavy set woman with no head. Perhaps a former house-keeper?

You know...the more I look at this, the more I notice.

I don't think it's barefoot. To me, it looks like she is wearing a beige shoe that comes up to the ankle.

Also...have we absolutely ruled out that this isn't a motion blur? I took some pictures last week with my aperature set really low and got very similar effects. If one part of a subject doesn't move, you can get the effect like what the foot shows. The parts that do move, give similar effects like the rest of this woman's body.

I can see all those things NAP, I can also see the shoe...but the bag is definate! Cool catch Tim...Lets go back...I love the san reno 🙂