Top 5 Ghost Photographs of All Time!

I would have to say #3 also... Enough said!

Hmm I finally took these pics into my paint shop and took a close look. I can't come to any conclusion on #1 but I have read where it was debunked right after it was taken by some photo experts of the time
#2 It seems the man is sitting inside the chair not on the seat so it MAY be real you would think if it was faked it would be composed better.
#3 I cant tell I can see a face behind the guy but its too grainy to tell I voted this one the most likely to be real.
#4 Its an odd angle to take a picture but when i look close the hand that is further up on the railing seems to be a left hand with the thumb on the right instead of left side of the hand. Fake fake fake shouts out there UNless there is another spook there with its hand on the railing lmao
#5 I can't tell but when I blow up the person in the back they have this god aweful smirk on her face and the glasses reflecting do make it look like the eyes are glowing. ITs a mother in law but dead or alive I cant tell

.......
#5 I can't tell but when I blow up the person in the back they have this god aweful smirk on her face and the glasses reflecting do make it look like the eyes are glowing. ITs a mother in law but dead or alive I cant tell

😆

Numbers 1, 2 and 3 haven been debunked over the years and 4 I'm not sure of. I voted for 5 because I remember reading the story regarding this pic. If you're looking for the hidden person in the army pic, he's behind the man, 4th from the left in the back row. Story tells that he was someone helping when the pic was snapped and just happened to be at the back of the group.

I would have to say that I had seen pic #3 before and out of the choices here it still seems the most real to me.

I had voted for picture number 3. These have been around for a long time. The first and second one I know had been debunked, but I had never heard anything on number 3. I still think it looks real but would like to read about the debunking on this one.

I did voted number 3, but I bet it's going to be the one that's not conclusive. I almost hesitated in picking this one because you really can't see the actual image in comparison with the zoomed one. However, since the image didn't wear a hat and how transparent it was seemed a bit odd. Number two I believe back in that time if you moved the person would look like a ghost. You can see this in most 1860's pictures especially the civil war ones. The others are most definite hoaxed.

I did voted number 3, but I bet it's going to be the one that's not conclusive. I almost hesitated in picking this one because you really can't see the actual image in comparison with the zoomed one. However, since the image didn't wear a hat and how transparent it was seemed a bit odd. Number two I believe back in that time if you moved the person would look like a ghost. You can see this in most 1860's pictures especially the civil war ones. The others are most definite hoaxed.

perhaps we should have the top 5 viewer ghostphotographs would u guys want to submit your entries?

in all honesty i have seen all these pics before, and i think the only one i havent seen outed as a fake is no 3, and so thats where my vote goes.

its unfortunate that people fake so much, becuse as soon as you get something genuine, its still gonna be put down by most as fake, spesh as technology gets better and better

Reasons:
1. The picture seems like it came straight out of a horror flick, and the ability to create the image via a photo editing tool is pretty easy. Beside the ghost seems a bit too clear for all the glowing effects it is putting out eh? Look at her cute little feet... 😁

2. Same as number two, but with a sepia tone. Besides why are all the distortions/noise in the picture pointed so perfectly downwards. What is that on top of the picture, fingers?... or are we hiding under a potted plant because we see ghosts?

3. Anyone can place a transparent picture behind another person in a picture. However, the photograph looks like a legit photo shoot and the ghost not so much. As spirits mentioned the resemblance, WTH is Matt Leblanc doing there?

4. The lighting and backdrop seems like a good environment to take a shot of some scary pictures too. Quick I see one *snap*, CHEA! Awww that ghost must be really tired...

5. :O that looks like a demon! Scared the bejeezus outta me... well not really, but it was the scariest out of all the pictures. Like the third picture, the situation the picture was taken seemed real enough, but the ghost with the flaming/glowing eyes seems a bit much. Just take this picture as a warning to ward off spirits, or else ghosts with flaming eyes following you home!

Well as you can see, I do not really believe any of these pictures as conclusive, since there is always reasons to cast some form of doubt on any picture. From my deductions I have concluded that either #3 or #5 would be the most legit. However, the ghost with flaming eyes made me scared, so I went with #3 instead. *burns sage*

LOL! Those are not flamming eyes... those are glasses and the spirit in question is supose to be the man in the front seats mother inlaw who crossed over and i think he and his wife were visiting her grave when this picture was taken... I belive thats what the caption said when i read it on another site?

Numbers 1, 2 and 3 haven been debunked over the years and 4 I'm not sure of. I voted for 5 because I remember reading the story regarding this pic. If you're looking for the hidden person in the army pic, he's behind the man, 4th from the left in the back row. Story tells that he was someone helping when the pic was snapped and just happened to be at the back of the group.

Hmmmmmmmmm... the whole "someone helping " does not make any sense to me ... helping how? making sure all these "grown" men are looking at the camera for the photo? i do not get it! why would he be standing there looking right at the camera? if he were helping to do something it seems he would be busy doing something other then mugging for the camera or at least duck knowing the camera was going to go off and that he was not supose to be part of the picture... so this expliantion really makes no sense to me I do not belive it has been debunked

these are all old photos, developed from film, its possible that during processing a previous image on the plate transferred to the new image, this might explain the spare soldier, also clever burning and dodging in film development can giv you the spirits on the stairs, as for the old man in the chair...exposure time for these photos could well have been uo to 2 or 3 minutes so in that time while the shutter is open if something moves quickly out of the frame it can appear transparent. The woman in the back of the car is interesting but without evidence we dont know if she is actually dead or not at the time the picture was taken.
Sorry to be so skeptical, i want to beleive really I do thats why im in this field.

Never apologize for being skeptical.

Its too easy these days or Photoshop something in... pretty sad actually because then ppl think we all fake things... THANKS TAPS.. GRRRR

heheeh LG is right!

TAPS means fake... Sadly!!!