Notifications
Clear all

Please check out these 2 pics

12 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
153 Views
(@stmac70)
Posts: 276
Reputable Member
Topic starter
 
[#215]

Let me know what you think....a firend of mine said that her friend took her kid to get pictures with Santa and this is what she got back....weird...They think its the virgin Mary but i think the 2nd one looks like a painting of something biblical....but i cant explain the thing over her shoulder.The only info I have is that its supposed to be a little boy taking a picture with Santa Clause...


 
Posted : 17/12/2007 7:24 pm
(@anddos)
Posts: 247
Reputable Member
 

who is who , i see 3 figures this pic , perhaps edit it and label who the girl and child is please


 
Posted : 17/12/2007 7:46 pm
(@stmac70)
Posts: 276
Reputable Member
Topic starter
 

who is who , i see 3 figures this pic , perhaps edit it and label who the girl and child is please

well i did ask the girl for more info . All I know at the moment is that it was this girls son and santa in the picture. 2 people only Santa and a little boy. Thats the deal she wants to know what this is over her son.


 
Posted : 17/12/2007 7:49 pm
(@bkiff)
Posts: 674
Prominent Member
 

I don't know. These pics are a bit shaky.


 
Posted : 17/12/2007 9:18 pm
(@crypt)
Posts: 44
Trusted Member
 

a double exposure? only reason is because i notice it was taken by a film camera and they do sometimes stick especially the one use ones


 
Posted : 18/12/2007 12:03 am
(@anddos)
Posts: 247
Reputable Member
 

ok well on the right it looks like a lady behind the child , grey hair and stripey jumper ,thats all i can make out


 
Posted : 18/12/2007 12:20 am
(@stmac70)
Posts: 276
Reputable Member
Topic starter
 

a double exposure? only reason is because i notice it was taken by a film camera and they do sometimes stick especially the one use ones

I agree I think its double exposure also....just wanted to get others opinions..I dont know this particular person and the person that sent the pics is unavailable at this time so i cant get anymore info out of her..I believe it was not a digital because she said something about these being the only 2 pics that had anything on them.


 
Posted : 18/12/2007 12:25 am
(@anddos)
Posts: 247
Reputable Member
 

if its double exposure then why is the women fit perfectly so she is just behind him , why dosent she just apear anywhere on the pic , see what i mean?


 
Posted : 18/12/2007 12:52 am
(@train)
Posts: 1281
Noble Member
 

who is who , i see 3 figures this pic , perhaps edit it and label who the girl and child is please

well i did ask the girl for more info . All I know at the moment is that it was this girls son and santa in the picture. 2 people only Santa and a little boy. Thats the deal she wants to know what this is over her son.

The only thing i can see is some other figure possibly (maybe a girl) i kept looking at it,,,its just not in perfect focus..but its pretty awesome anyhow..there is indeed something there, just not sure what it is..too bad you could not somehow zoom into that area and blow it up..

thanks for sharing dude 🙂


 
Posted : 18/12/2007 1:15 am
(@arcticwolf)
Posts: 67
Estimable Member
 

In all honest truth, there is not enough clarity in the image to tell who is who or what it what. It is fairly obvious that when the individual took the picture that there was definate movement downward with the camera - you can see this in the image because of the lengthening or smearing of the images - they're elongated or stretched downward.

I did try to clarify the image to make it a little easier to see but it is really bad and not much more could be done with it - I have labeled the proper people I hope:

It appears that all 3 images were there at the time of exposure although the darker shadow on the right edge does not appear to be stretched as the other 3 are.

I can't say if there's a image as the original post says - to me it looks like all 3 people are real and live, but the dark image - that's what I'm not sure about.

Also, just as a note, while attempting to clarify the image more - due to the pixelation of the image there appeared to be the image of a skull in Santa's face/beard, but again this was only because of the pixelation and the fact that the brain will transform something it can not clearly see into something that it can associate with it and make the viewer believe they are seeing something they are not.


 
Posted : 18/12/2007 3:51 am
(@spook)
Posts: 1111
Noble Member
 

i'd have to say, i agree with double exposure.. but then i see the flashes/light tricks behind Santa (to his left) and the unknown woman (to her right) which are similar to faults in a digital camera. so i'm questionable about this photo. definitely requires clarity. with AW's fix, it does appear like a woman in the "unknown" as well as another figure behind her.

interesting catch. too bad there wasn't a 2nd photo for comparision reasons.

spook


 
Posted : 18/12/2007 11:30 am
(@oregonmom)
Posts: 78
Trusted Member
 

If this was in a mall or store, they usually use large florescent lamps or lighting, add that to the florescent lighting in a store and a wiggly camera and that's what happens with the light.
Trippy, if the woman wasn't there at the time the pic was taken, could she have walked up while you were taking the picture? Looks like she was maybe going up to position the little boy for the picture.


 
Posted : 18/12/2007 2:53 pm
Share: