Tim Wood and Sapphire explore the Dumas Brothel in Butte, Montana, testing several rooms and the basement before returning upstairs. Recorder sessions and playback are combined with a word-generating device and SLS camera observations. Early playback is interpreted as “go away”; a later session asks about a reported dark presence. The team describes a tap near the window shortly after asking for a sign, while device readings and potential movement remain unverified. The recording also preserves alternative explanations: an early noise may be handcuffs, an apparent orb is identified as dust, and a late visual impression may be a bug. A viewer’s “mist” report occurs near the equipment session, and another suggests a phrase after the team has already begun closing remarks. These viewer suggestions require independent listening/visual review rather than being treated as confirmed evidence.

Select a timestamp to start playback from that moment.

Key Moments

Chapters combine transcript-supported additions with existing archive chapters and attributed viewer observations where available. Source labels identify reviewed additions. Reported experiences and transcribed interpretations do not establish their cause.

Reviewed captions span 0:00–1:03:06. Auto-generated captions may mishear speech and do not independently verify audio or images. Only loaded top-level comments were sampled; replies and live chat were not exhaustively reviewed, and viewer flags remain unverified.

  1. Dumas Brothel walkthrough with Tim and SapphireSource: transcript review
  2. Piano sign requested and location introducedSource: transcript review
  3. EVP: First recorder session on the bedSource: transcript review
  4. Sound heard; handcuffs consideredSource: transcript review
  5. Apparent orb identified as dustSource: transcript review
  6. PHYSICAL REPORT: Cold sensation reportedSource: transcript review
  7. EVP: First EVP playbackSource: transcript review
  8. EVP: “Go away” playback interpretationSource: transcript review
  9. Walkthrough continuesSource: transcript review
  10. Previous bone-find recollectionSource: transcript review
  11. Basement exploration and temperature impressionsSource: transcript review
  12. WORD DEVICE: Word-device method explainedSource: transcript review
  13. WORD DEVICE: “Sandra / liberty” word outputs discussedSource: transcript review
  14. WORD DEVICE: Coin identification questionSource: transcript review
  15. WORD DEVICE: Basement word-output questionsSource: transcript review
  16. Blocked tunnel discussedSource: transcript review
  17. PHYSICAL REPORT: Basement unease and smellSource: transcript review
  18. Exploring stored objects and an old shoeSource: transcript review
  19. WORD DEVICE: Word-device sensitivity changedSource: transcript review
  20. Move upstairs with recorder and SLSSource: transcript review
  21. WORD DEVICE: Movement output and chest discomfort reportedSource: transcript review
  22. VISUAL REPORT: SLS doorway invitation and detection reportSource: transcript review
  23. Door and noise requestsSource: transcript review
  24. WORD DEVICE: Room 17 and device lightsSource: transcript review
  25. PHYSICAL REPORT: Corner-room impressionsSource: transcript review
  26. Viewer flags possible mist by pocketSource: YouTube viewer comment
  27. EVP questions about the building’s ownersSource: transcript review
  28. EVP: Short recorder playbackSource: transcript review
  29. EVP: Recorder placed on chair for longer sessionSource: transcript review
  30. EVP: Questions about reported dark presenceSource: transcript review
  31. Red floor substance discussedSource: transcript review
  32. SOUND REPORT: Window sign requested; tap reportedSource: transcript review
  33. SOUND REPORT: Request to repeat tapSource: transcript review
  34. VISUAL REPORT: Focus and SLS color/detection discussionSource: transcript review
  35. Movement seen; bug consideredSource: transcript review
  36. EVP: Long EVP session playbackSource: transcript review
  37. Closing remarksSource: transcript review
  38. Viewer suggests possible “what for” voiceSource: YouTube viewer comment
Original YouTube investigation notes